I like that this contains the golden ratio which is a structural element in chaos in the sense that a source is also an element.

I’ love to experiment like this in the future.

I know that composition is one of the main elements in photography but I’d rather focus on the information delivered in the photograph rather than the aesthetic value.

Though this is quite morbid it is at the same time beautiful, this oxymoron is definately an occurance in chaos as it can be both positive and negative.

A lot of information to digest in this.

I like the voyeristic aspect of seeing what you shouldn’t be able to.

This photo looks quite ghostly at a glance but then you realise its a window.

This shows that a compression occured before expansion. Which vaguely explains the variance of colour in the universe.

All these works very clearly display chaotic structure.

I like the idea of creating dream-like photos as it provides lots of room for viewers to interpret how this compares with how they’re living, as its most likely to be quite drasically different.

Chaos is an incredibly complex idea though it seems simple so far, there is a layer under that simplicity. These ‘utoptic’ photos are contradictually are so that they become dystopic which I find incredibly interesting as sometimes when something that is so perfect could be hell as there would be no diversity and little chaos this would cycle back to red shift, looking at the EMS indigo and violet are right at the other end as they are visually, but not humanly visably, ultra-violet and gamma waves. this inevitably must circle back to red shift. As, though this is arguable, nothing can be perfect.

Combined with the structurally sound I think organic forms are also a key aspect.

Another gallery I visited while in Berlin. I like the collage structure of this piece of workas it presents connections really well.

When I wnet on the Berlin trip I went to the Daimler gallery I saw some of Richard Mosse’s work.

He looks at incorporating the infrared spectrum, which is a part of the electromagnteic spectrum, as a part of his photography. Infrared radiation is toward the redshift part of the electromagnetic spectrum. I wonder if he based his work on the current motional events of the universe. Though these are , in a way somewhat distressing documentry form of photography making Red shift, the negative shift, understandable.

Paterson looks at how the cosmic world behaves, casting a scientific eye over it. It specifically looks at space and time which may ironicly sound vague.

A History of Darkness

These cosmic photos explore chaos in the universe and how much information can be captured when information its reflected off of the moon. Its interesting that the grain that is recieved back is increased though less light is received.

The end with blocks of light are the ones that were projected and the ones with less and speckles of light are received ones.

I find that the look of the hand written slides some how makes this project more personal and authentic.

Inside the universe lies the tiniest grain of sand

Much like our universe from mars or a distant planet’s perspective we are the grain of sand.

Lambda Print

I really like how the colours of the cityscape merge really well the stellar landscape of the stellar milky way. Does this/can we argue that how we treat our planet has a chaotic effect on the rest of the universe? I think it might?

A diagram of the colours/frequencies in our universe

The main colours are red, blue and cosmic latte/yellow. Indicating the shift of the universe. Truthfully scientis are not sure as it changes all the time – due to chaos. However visually red is most prominant indicating red shift is most likely occuring (the universe is expanding). On the other hand there is a lot of ‘cosmic latte’, or a yellowy colour, this could be because there is a lot of space junk or more likely that the universe is sometimes stationary, for the universe would have to stop expanding to be able to contract.

This is from a exhibition I went to recently, I just think its so odd how such a perfectly structurally sound shape such as a circle is such a common occurance in such an unpredictable universe. In mandalas specifically, like this one.

In her research, like it is most commonly said that red shift is occuring.

The physical and literal definitions of chaos hold significantly differently meanings. I think the literal definition resembles a glance and the physical, an in depth, long look. I indend to show both of these in my work, but more so the physical deffinition.

All chaos has a source. Inevitably everything has the same source.

Reference to expansion.

The same chaos will always have a different route from different perspectives.

The more you think about somethimg the more accumilation occurs creating and the closer it is becoming enlarged, or physical.

Our brain works on a structure of association and a process of elimination.

There is chaos in everything, including the mind.

The world we live in is highly sensitive, as such small turn of events could lead to the occurance of life or death.

Unlike it seems chaos has structure much like a pyramid or collapsing dominoes.

The Lorenz attractor illustrates chaos/the butterfly effect. Chaos is some what infinite if you look at the simplified attractor below.

The pictures below illustrate how chaos is a little like a russian doll; one event incapsulating the next, supporting the idea that it is infinite, all of which are from Chaos, James Gielck.

I’ve described chaos as a russian doll, a pyramid or a domino, shows its visual elements are broad, this is shown by the number of diagrams that present chaos.

This supports that chaos can have both positive and negative impacts.